Key Themes
Architectural Types + Purposes
Services
Strategy
Strategies
Virtual [Main Strategy]
Flexible
Mobile
Distributed
Research Topics
Parliament House
House of Representatives
Chamber Architecture
Debate/Discussion + Architecture
diagram 1- parliament infrastructure img ref [http://www.peo.gov.au/students/cl/aph.html#how]
Diagram 2 - ceremonial axis
Diagram 3 - chamber floor plan
Reflection
My main focus this week was to explore architecture and technology that facilitated debate + discussion. I wanted to rethink existing parliament chambers and conceive of a space that reflected my statement of democracy through debate. I also integrated a virtual strategy to maximize the idea of debate and expand potential of debate beyond the physical parameters of parliament infrastructure.
What if we thought of parliament as an open house not a closed house?
I am interested in this question as it starts with a change in political ethos and has the potential to become an architectural manifestation that is more flexible than the existing parliament. It explores a different model of parliament and begins to critique the status quo.
The current parliament consists of two main chambers, the senate and the house of reps, where many of the main issues are debated. The primary function of these spaces is to 'house' political discussion between party leaders and various ministers. The discussion is moderator by the speaker of the house. These discussions are made public, however, there is no public engagement at this particular forum. The ministers engaged in the discussion are elected representatives, however, one could argue that the absence of public integration in these debates dilutes the idea of democracy. What would happen to the political process if we injected a public voice into parliament essentially transforming it into and 'open house'
What service will this open house provide?
Essentially it will act as a public 'presence' as well as a seat at the conversation table for public 'proxies'. The proxy is a virtual representative of the public which will utilize digital technology to connect people with the discussion. Social media such as twitter and facebook can be used to connect people to the discussion which expands the debate exponentially. Inspiration was taken from the Q and A TV show on ABC which utilizes live twitter updates during the on screen discussion.
The word cloud on QANDA's website is a list of the 25 most used twitter words. This is a good example of how social media can allow for a deeper analysis of conversation and public opinion. I am interested in how digital tools can change the landscape of political debate and ultimately improve the political process.








